Saturday, 17 May 2014

LA Kings eliminate rival Anaheim Ducks, continue Game 7 mastery

Some people just know how to do this Game 7 thing.
The Los Angeles Kings eliminated the Anaheim Ducks in the seventh game of their Pacific Division final, 6-2, moving on to the conference final vs. Chicago and moving to 6-0 in the 2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs in potential elimination games.
Every player who scored a goal for the Kings had never lost a Game 7, and are now a combined 27-0 in the Game 7s they’ve played in.
Which is fairly clutch.
The Anaheim Ducks, on the other hand, fell to 2-4 in franchise history in Game 7. Ryan Getzlaf andCorey Perry fell to a combined 2-6 in Game 7. Bruce Boudreau, the coach that’s never led a team to the conference final, still hasn’t, and is now 1-5 in career Game 7s, his last win coming in 2009.
Which is the opposite of clutch.
The Kings were dominant in Game 7, pouring 16 shots on rookie goalie John Gibson in the first period and putting three past in him the opening 15:12 of the game.
Justin Williams opened the scoring on the power plan, collecting a puck in front of Gibson and tucking home his sixth career Game 7 goal in six career Game 7s.
Jeff Carter has the Kings’ second goal, muscling past Hampus Lindholm at center ice and then scoring on Gibson on a delayed penalty, just 4:18 after Williams’ goal.
The Ducks had a chance to get back into the game with a Corey Perry penalty shot – on a play that saw his stick break before Drew Doughty allegedly broke it – but Jonathan Quick made the save.Mike Richards scored his second of the playoffs at 15:12 of the first, using a little give-and-go withDwight King to tip the puck past Gibson.
(Yes, three ex-Flyers scoring against Bruce Boudreau, who lost his first Game 7 against the Flyers in Washington.)
Gibson returned for the start of the second period, but lasted only 2:02. A center ice turnover by the Ducks led to a 2-on-1 with Anze Kopitar and Dwight King, with Kopitar beating him for his fifth of the playoffs.
With that, the rookie sensation was sent to the bench.
Marian Gaborik scored his NHL-leading ninth goal on the power play at 14:08 against Jonas Hiller to make it 5-0.
The Ducks began a mini-comeback with a Kyle Palmieri goal that snuck inside Quick’s pad near the post at 17:02 of the second. Corey Perry made it 5-2 with his fourth of the playoffs, scored 4-on-4 at 3:42 of the third. Getzlaf nearly cut the lead again on the next shift, but Quick made a key save.
After that, the Ducks took a pair of minor penalties and Quick was up to the task. Tanner Pearson’s goal at 13:54 of the third capped the scoring for the Kings.
The game marked the end of Teemu Selanne’s magical NHL career, as the Ducks legend vowed this would be his last season in the League. Selanne skated 14:02 for the game and was a minus-1 with three shots on goal. He finished the postseason with two goals in 11 games.
With five minutes left, the Los Angeles Kings fans visiting the Honda Center sang “Na Na Na Hey Hey Goodbye.” They won three games in Anaheim in the Freeway Faceoff. Now, they carry California hockey’s flag into the Western Conference Final against the Chicago Blackhawks, beginning on Sunday.

FA Cup final: Arsenal's Aaron Ramsey denies Hull City with late winner

The FA Cup final is on a roll. This was another engrossing game and enthralling occasion, and if there was no fairytale ending this time at least the less fancied side gave a great account of themselves. Arsenal's nine-year trophy drought is at an end while Hull's 110-year wait for major silverware goes on, though you would never have guessed watching a memorable final that there was such a disparity between the aspirations and achievements of the two sides.
Strictly speaking Arsène Wenger is no longer a specialist in failure, though his team still look a long way short of the Arsenal of old and it is debatable whether being pushed all the way by Wigan in the semi and now Hull in the final amounts to the sort of success that can be crowed about.
There are still questions that need to be answered, though as Yaya Sanogo tweeted before the game Arsenal have at least managed to win more than Chelsea, even if it was the 19th minute of extra time before Aaron Ramsey finally put the Gunners in front, applying a snappy first-time finish to Olivier Giroud's clever back-heel pass. Giroud had hit the bar from Ramsey's cross in the first period of extra time so Hull probably knew they had it coming. They had defended doggedly for much of the game to give themselves a chance of a penalty shoot out, but had no answer to the fresh legs Wenger was able to introduce for the final 15 minutes of extra time.
By astutely keeping back jackWilshere and Tomas Rosicky until the break in extra time, Wenger added some much-needed energy and invention and, though the pair were not directly involved in the winning goal, their arrival seemed to daunt their opponents. For all that, penalties might still have been needed had not Arsenal survived a last-gasp scare when Lukasz Fabianski came out of his area and failed to stop a run from Sone Aluka, whose shot from a narrow angle missed only by inches. With the same player bringing a save from Fabianski right at the death the drama at the end was intense.
Two and a half hours earlier the game had got off to the brightest of starts, with Hull taking the lead from virtually their first attack. Ahmed Elmohamady won a corner on the right, Stephen Quinn hit it long to pick out Tom Huddlestone loitering just outside the area for a volley and, though the execution was imperfect and the shot was missing the target, James Chester managed a back-heel deflection on the way through to leave Fabianski wrong-footed.
If that was encouraging for Steve Bruce's side, the Tigers were in dreamland four minutes later when Hull doubled their lead. This time Fabianski was not quite so blameless. He should have dealt better with a tame header from Alex Bruce from a Quinn cross rather than letting it bounce off his left post, allowing Curtis Davies to joyfully snaffle the rebound. The reason so many Hull defenders were in forward positions was that they had just come up for a free-kick that Arsenal only half-cleared.
As one of the major questions about Hull's ability to contest this final was whether they would score a goal at all, with Shane Long injured and Nikica Jelavic ineligible, scoring twice in the opening eight minutes was an entirely unexpected boost.
The only nagging doubt at the back of Hull minds would have been whether the goals had come too early. They had caught Arsenal off guard but Wenger's side did have recognised goalscorers and as long as they did not panic still had more than 80 minutes to play themselves back into the match.
Those fears began to take shape when Santi Cazorla arrowed a shot direct from a free-kick into Allan McGregor's top-left corner after Bruce had fouled him a couple of yards outside the area. Sumptuous as the strike was, there was not much bend or dip on the shot, and the goalkeeper had a clear enough sight of it to be disappointed when it flew past him.
Arsenal were dominating the game by the end of the first half, rarely allowing Hull the opportunity to cross the halfway line, and could have been level had Ramsey been able to supply a finish when Mesut Özil rolled a ball invitingly across the Hull goal. Bruce had seen a header cleared off the line by Aaron Gibbs from a corner, but if Hull were only threatening from set pieces and Arsenal were successfully pinning them in their own half, McGregor's goal was always likely to be the one under threat. When Matty Fryatt managed a rare breakaway just past the half-hour, he looked up from an advanced position on the left and found precisely no one in the middle awaiting a cross or a pass. Huddlestone sent a shot over Fabianski's bar a couple of minutes later to raise an optimistic cheer from the Hull end, though it was from 30 yards out and Arsenal were comfortable with goal attempts from that sort of distance.
Özil pulled another inviting ball back across the Hull goal at the start of the second half but found Lukas Podolski unable to take advantage, before Huddlestone sent another harmless shot over Fabianski's bar merely as a more elegant way of timewasting than some of his team-mates had already been managing. By the hour stage, with Arsenal coming no closer to a goal than a desperately hopeful tumble by Giroud in the hope of a penalty after the slightest of touches by Huddlestone, Wenger sent on Yaya Sanogo to show his pre match tweet was not merely wish fulthinking
With Laurent Koscielny putting a header wide from a corner, however, Arsenal needed a goal to make history and make José Mourinho reconsider his words. As the game entered its final 20 minutes, with the Hull goal far from under siege, Arsenal looked the team under pressure and hopes of a Tiger feat began to grow. So it was slightly cruel when Arsenal equalised, not with a flash of brilliance from Ozil or Ramsey but through a scruffy goal at a set piece. Cazorla's corner was played back towards McGregor's goal by a couple of ricochets from Hull defenders, to allow Koscielny, standing in front of the goalkeeper, to turn and scuff the ball across the line. For the Arsenal fans at that end the goal was a thing of beauty. For the Hull support at the other end of the pitch the disappointment will only increase when they see on television that McGregor was correct in protesting that the corner should never have been awarded in the first place.
Gibbs had the best chance of securing a result in normal time when he produced one of the great Wembley misses from the six-yard line but Ramsey was more deadly when his extra time opportunity arrived. Arsenal's celebrations at the end were almost as heartfelt and joyous as Wigan's last year but, even as Wenger soaked up the champagne, the bookies were quoting his side odds-on to win no trophies next year. For Arsenal this was a huge relief but not quite a fairytale.

Box Office: 'Godzilla' Scores $38.5M Friday, Could Reach $100M

Godzilla earned a surprising $38.5 million on its opening day, including $9.3m in Thursday showings and $6.2m in IMAX alone. How I love it when the tracking is wrong. As a box office pundit, there are few things more enjoyable than a happy box office surprise, when a film vastly over-performs its tracking and expectations. Such is the case Godzilla. It was perhaps reasonable to wonder how front-loaded Godzilla was coming off of its robust Thursday numbers, but last night’s totals solidify that it’s basically playing like a general audiences blockbuster. This one is pulling in moviegoers far outside the “geek crowd”. The film earned about $1m less than Captain America: The Winter Soldier did on Thursday yet earned $2m more on Friday while earning about $3m more than The Amazing Spider-Man 2 ($35m). It is beyond cliche to refer to a Godzilla film as a “box office monster”, but if the shoe fits… The only question now is whether it ends up in the $90m range or whether it ends up over $100m for the weekend.Going off a $38.5 million Friday, a mere 2.59x multiplier gets it over the nine-figure mark. So while that’s a pretty strong multiplier for a monster movie, it’s not completely impossible. $100m wouldn’t surprise me, but I also don’t want to get anyone thinking that $95m is somehow now disappointing. Fueled by kid-powered matinee business, Warner Bros. (a division of Time Warner is surely looking at a debut weekend of $93-$98m, barring unexpected frontloading. That’s right in the wheelhouse of The Amazing Spider-Man 2 ($91m) and Captain America: The Winter Soldier ($95m). And unlike Amazing Spider-Man 2 (which is still dropping hard and won’t clear $175m by Sunday), Godzilla didn’t cost $250m to produce.
with
At $160 million, the film is set to earn back its budget domestically by the end of next weekend and possibly top it worldwide by tomorrow depending on the overseas numbers. It earned $22.3m overseas on Friday and has now earned $43m overseas since Thursday and $81m worldwide thus far. To paraphrase the tagline from the last Godzilla film, “budget does matter.” This is Legendary Picture’s last production with Warner Bros. (Legendary put up about 75% of the budget), and they will clearly be missed. But the opening figure itself is a marketing triumph by the DREAm Factory, as this is the second new frachise that Warner Bros. has launched just this year after the $460 million-grossing THE LEGE Movie. When I talk about how Warner Bros. doesn’t “need” a multi-film DC Cinematic Universe, this is what I mean.The film screened early enough to build strong critical buzz and the review embargo dropped early enough to let audiences know that they’d presumably like what they saw. The teasers and trailers promised a grand-scale and dead-serious monster film, with an emphasis on human characters (Bryan Cranston’s crazed scientist and ken watanabe’s tormented scientist specifically) and just enough creature footage and destructo-carnage to wet appetites without giving away the store. It’s no secret I liked the film less than many of my peers, but there are plenty of moments that will make audiences gasp and 85% of those moments were not in the marketing campaign.
Gareth Edwards delivered the monster-mash goods and Warner Bros.’ marketing did the rest. This was a film that pretty much everyone I knew, film nerds and “regular folk”, wanted to see or were at least curious about. These numbers indicate that quite a few merely curious moviegoers took the plunge last night and will presumably continue to take the plunge over weekend. I can’t exactly pretend that a big-budget remake of Godzilla scoring huge is “good for the industry” in any serious fashion, but again I’m always happy to see a well-marketed movie over-perform the pre-release expectations. It keeps this game fun and I’d much rather write about surprise hits than surprise flops. We’ll see how it holds up over the weekend, but even a somewhat front-loaded $85m weekend is a massive win for Godzilla.
The only other new release was Walt Disney’s Million Dollar Arm, which starsJon Hamm as a sports manager who recruits kids from India to play American baseball. Disney attempted the old-school counter-programming route, but the reviews weren’t there and there are enough films of all stripes and sizes to get most moviegoers going elsewhere. The film earned $3.46 million on Friday, setting the stage for a $11m debut. Walt Disney is mostly getting out of the non-franchise game, and this film’s sad debut implies they may be right. Still, kudos to theMouse House for offering at least the occasional non-franchise centric flick amid the Marvel movies and animated blockbusters. Next up on that scale is The Hundred-Foot Journey in August. There is much to be discussed about how Jon Hamm couldn’t translate his starring role on a cult television show (Mad Men is one of thebest vision shows ever aired, but it’s not a ratings blockbuster) into mainstream movie stardom, but that’s for another day.
There isn’t much holdover news that can’t wait until tomorrow. Universal’s (a division of ComcastNeighbors earned $8.4 million yesterday and has now grossed $73.93m. The crowdpleasing Seth rogen/Rose Byrne/Zac Efron comedy should finish the weekend with $26 million (-45%, thanks Godzilla!) and a $91m domestic cume. The Amazing Spider-Man 2earned another $4.5m, and Sony projects a $16.5m weekend and a $171m 17-day domestic cume. It’s also racing towards $600m worldwide. Jon Favreau‘sChef expanded to 72 screens and earned another $200k. The film should top $1m by tomorrow. The Other Woman earned $2m for a $67m cume. In the meantime, if you’re going to see Godzilla, splurge for the IMAX tickets. The 3D is fine and it’s worth it for the sheer size of the IMAX screen.

Preakness 2014: The race always goes on, but will Chrome?

As the legendary Barbara Fritchie, a Maryland civil war heroine, might have said if she had lived a lot longer and taken a fancy to a colt named california chrome‘Shoot if you must this old gray head. But one damned musket ball or anything else ain’t gonna stop this Preakness.’’
It’s the same message strongly repeated by a corporal’s guard of state police to a 23-year-old drunk named Lee Chang Ferrell, during a preliminary race one Preakness day.
He had hurdled a restraining fence and taken a position facing an onrushing army of thoroughbreds. He took a half-step left and swung a wild haymaker at the race’s leader, Artex.
He missed.
The state cops didn’t.
The Preakness went on as scheduled.
Of course it did. Two years earlier, track-wide power stage cut into the betting, but the race went on.
And so it will be today. Thursday, when the huge favorite California Chrome coughed in his stall, chalk players all over America choked on their morning coffee.
But one equine throat tickle can’t stop this path to the second jewel of the Triple Crown any more than Lee Chang Ferrell looping right hand could. Yesterday morning, California Chrome’s throat was swapped with a glycerene throat wash. And God bless the miracle of better things for better living through chemistry. The colt’s throat is so clear now that any moment you could expect him to sing a snappy chorus of "Tomorrow," since that’s when the odds-makers are sure he will be two-thirds of the way toward the Triple Crown.
For the record, William G. "Cowboy Billy" Gowan, the man who trains Ride On Curlin, does not necessarily disagree, but this is horse racing, and without a little bit of skepticism, he would surely be drummed out of the lodge. So yesterday, when asked about California Chrome’s invincibility, Billy responded with:
"He (CC) is a beautiful horse, but if you are asking me what I want to see, I’d hope my horse gets a great trip and then see them together at the head of the stretch, and we can find out what each of them is made of."
Until post time, who is to say he’s wrong?
Certainly, in this shorter-than-the-Derby race (1 and 3/16ths miles) there will be speed to burn not counting whatever path California Chrome chooses to follow. Bayern,social inclusion, Pablo del Monte and General Rod are each capable of trying to steal this thing. How Chrome’s jockey, Victor Espinoza, deals with this strategy will be interesting to see, particularly in view of a new shooter, Dynamic Impact, who won the Illinois Derby with the best Beyer (speed) number of the entire field at 102.
Add to these the traditional closers, Ride On Curlin and Kid Cruz (the only horse that has won a race over this track), and no matter what happens, if they hold form, we have a hell of a clambake.
Which brings us to the mystery lady of these proceedings. Her name is Ria Antonia. She is the only filly who has dared to come out and play with the boys this year. Calvin Borel once rode another filly in the Preakness, and you should recall her name was Rachel Alexandra, because she is the only filly ever to win it.
"I know Calvin’s confidence is very strong after yesterday’s work," said Tom Amoss, who trains the filly. "And that’s what I like — a rider who buckles his chin trap and says, ‘I’m going to win this race,’ and I know that’s how Calvin feels."
She is a nice filly, although she never had much of a chance in the Kentucky Oaks, but going against this opposition reminds me of a Pimlico racing story about what appeared to be an over-reaching filly at Pimlico.
There once was a tough-as-nails combination trainer and farm director named Sonny Simm, who stunned his peers by announcing he would send a filly named The Very One against a pretty good field colts in the Dixie Handicap.
They questioned the number of cards in his deck, to which he responded "We’ll see, we’ll see."
Whereupon, he went out to the farm with a very large jar, located a mare in heat and filled the jar with her urine. He told nobody. In the paddock that afternoon when they called "riders up" it wasn’t all that went up. Simms lifted his bottle, dumped and smeared all of its contents on the hind quarters of his filly.
When they came out of the gate, a strange thing happened.
All the colts fell behind The Very One, jostled for position but wouldn’t pass her. It was the first single-file horse race in history.
Barring that, I don’t expect Ria Antonia to win this thing.
I like California Chrome to win, but to get better value, I really like a boxed four-horse trifecta with CC, Social Inclusion, Ride on Curlin and Kid Cruz even better.

Narendra Modi's landslide victory shatters Congress's grip on India

The controversial Hindu nationalist leader Narendra Modi has pledged to work for all 1.25bn of his fellow Indians in his first speech after winning a historic landslide victory to take power in the world's largest democracy.
"Brothers, sisters, you have faith in me and I have faith in you," Modi, 63, told an ecstatic crowd in the town of Vadodara, from where he stood for election in the five-week poll. "The people of this country have given their verdict. This verdict says we have to make the dreams of 1.25bn people come true. I must work hard."
With most of the 550m votes counted, Modi's Bharatiya Janata party (BJP) appeared to have far exceeded all predictions and, with existing allies, were set to win as many as 350 of the 543 elected seats of India's lower house.
The Congress party, which has been in power since 2004 and for all but 18 of the last 67 years, appeared to be heading for its lowest ever tally, set for a mere 60 seats by mid afternoon.
Experts say the political landscape of India has been transformed. The vote is the most decisive mandate for any Indian leader since the 1984 assassination of prime minister Indira Gandhi propelled her son Rajiv to office.
World leaders rushed to telephone the news premier. Nawaz Sharif, the prime minister of neighbouring Pakistan, with which India has fought four wars, invited the new leader to visit.
The US president,Obama, did likewise, even though Modi was barred from the country less than 10 years ago under a law preventing entry to foreigners who had committed "particularly severe violations of religious freedom", Associated Press reported.Modi, who has been dogged by accusations of sectarian prejudice, appeared to make an effort to reassure those within India and beyond its borders who fear he will prove a divisive leader. "To run the country we need to take everyone with us, all together and I seek your blessings to succeed in this endeavour," he said.
The former tea seller who started his political leader with a far right Hindu revivalist organisation promised "good times ahead". In a second speech hours later, Modi invoked Mahatma Gandhi and stressed that "the only solution to every problem is [economic] development – without which India's destiny will not change".
Though a BJP win was expected, few predicted such a crushing victory. For 25 years India has been governed by coalitions, but the size of Modi's mandate means he will not have to work with allies and can set his own agenda. The party's regional strength is likely to be reinforced at local elections in coming months.Such power held by such a polarising figure will prompt some concern internationally. Ravi Shankar Prasad, a senior leader of the BJP who has been tipped as a potential foriegn minister told the Guardian that India would be "power with dignity, with responsibility and of constitutional integrity."
Prasad said however that though the BJP "wishes well for Pakistan", the neighbouring state needed to understand that "terrorism promoted from its soil would not be tolerated".
Supporters, who thronged the BJP headquarters in Delhi on Friday to sing, explode firecrackers, bang drums and chant support for Modi said he would bring honest government, efficient administration and much-needed economic reforms in the troubled nation. "I am elated. It's time for change," said Gautam Sood, 28, a student.The elections saw around 100 million first-time voters cast a ballot. Support amongst the young appears to be one key reason for the BJPs success. Another is inroads made into rural areas and traditional "votebanks" of the Congress party, such as those at the bottom of the caste system, India's tenacious social hierarchy.
Modi's "Development For All" message appeared to have struck a chord with frustrated voters, particularly the young, across the nation. It also countered accusations of sectarian prejudice, allowing BJP campaigners to argue that they believed in genuine equality because the party wants no communities to receive special treatment.
At the Congress headquarters, only a mile from those of the BJP, there was a very different mood. "It is very disappointing for us all, but we accept the verdict of the people. Congress has bounced back before and we are confident that we will bounce back again," said Rajeev Shukla, a former minister and senior party official.
The outgoing government was hit by allegations of corruption, its failure to rein in runaway inflation and faltering growth. India needs to create 10m jobs each year for new jobseekers alone, an area where the Congress officials admit they had "difficulty".Others blamed the defeat on a failure to communicate the party's achievements in their 10 years in power.Rahul Gandhi, 43-year-old scion of south Asia's most famous political dynasty and vice-president of Congress, retained his own seat of Amethi, but by a hugely reduced margin. The Cambridge-educated former management consultant  has struggled to connect with voters and failed to develop any significant momentum throughout the campaign. Congress officials nonetheless rallied around the Gandhi family. "This is not about one particular leader or individual," said Salman Soz, a party official.
But at a chaoti press conference late on Friday afternoon, Gandhi admitted Congress had done "pretty badly" and accepted responsibility for the party's worst ever defeat. Sonia gandhi, the president of Congress, called on the new government to avoid divisive policies and said her own party would focus on grassroots work. The 67-year-old won again from the constituency of Rae Bareli, an exception in a rout of dozens of senior Congress figures.
Ravi Shankar Prasad, the BJP leader, said the elections had revealed a "tectonic shift. The politics of dynasty, entitlement and inheritance has been rejected in favour of the politics of initiative and accomplishment based on hard work," he said.
Since being named as his party's candidate last September, Modi has flown more than 185,000 miles and addressed 457 rallies in a slick, presidential-style campaign that has broken the mould of Indian politics. A huge social media effort has reached out to voters across the nation. Modi received more than seven times the media coverage of his chief rival, one study showed.
Modi has promised that a BJP government would take decisive action to unblock stalled investments in power, road and rail projects to revive faltering growth. Indian stockmarkets soared early in the day as results began to be clear.
However, relations between India's 150 million Muslims and the Hindu majority, as much as development, was a key theme as candidates traded accusations of seeking to win votes through targeting particular communities or raising sectarian tensions.Modi has been accused of allowing, or even encouraging, riots in 2002 in the state of Gujarat, which he has run for 13 years, in which around 1,000 people, largely Muslims, died. The violence followed an arson attack on a train carrying Hindu pilgrims which killed 59. A supreme court investigation found insufficient evidence to support the charges against Modi, who has always denied any wrongdoing.
Party officials defended his record on Friday. "Let our work speak for us. Gujarat has the highest economic growth rate for Muslims in the country," said Prasad. "The myths have been broken. Mr Modi will govern for all India and all Indians."
In the key battleground state of Uttar Pradesh, which is particularly prone to sectarian violence, the BJP appeared set to win 70 or more of 80 seats, with around 40% of the vote share. The newly formed Aam Admi (common man) party, which has promised to revolutionise Indian politics and purge corruption from public life did not make the breakthrough some had hoped for, winning only four seats.
Ashutosh, who uses only one name, a former journalist who stood for the AAP in Delhi but lost, said the result was a "disappointment" but that an increase in the party's vote share in the capital from 29% to 33% was "a silver lining". He added: "We need to work on our organisation, we need to build a solid base, we need an effective communication system and to fine tune our ideological moorings."
The AAP's leader, Arvind Kejriwal, lost in a three-way fight with Narendra Modi, who stood from two constituencies, as permitted under India's electoral laws, and a Congress candidate. Kejriwal, a former tax inspector turned anti-graft activist, came second.Influential female regional leaders had mixed results. In Tamil Nadu, chief minister Jayalalithaa Jayaram's party, the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, was reported to be leading in 37 out of 39 seats, and Mamata Banerjee, chief minister of West Bengal, had done well but Mayawati Kumar, a key power broker in Uttar Pradesh had been wiped out.
One key question in coming months will be the influence on the new government of the vast conservative Hindu revivalist organisation where Modi started his career as an activist. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (National Volunteer Union) has been heavily involved in thecampaign and Modi and many other senior officials of the BJP, which is independent of the RSS though ideologically close, are still members of the organisation.
"The BJP is a cadre-based party and we are the cadre. Ideology and cadre is what makes BJP win," Rajeev Tuli, an RSS spokesman told the Guardian at the Delhi headquarters of the organisation, which has been banned by Indian authorities three times.
Analysts say the RSS and other hardline groups will now push hard for the fulfilment of core long-term demands such as the construction of a Hindu temple on the site of a demolished mosque in the northern town of Ayodhya.
Aides described how Modi had watched the results come in alone in the chief minister's residence in Gandhinagar in Gujarat. "He took no calls, just made a few around the country to key people. That's his way of doing things, very calm, very focused," one said.
Modi's visit to his 95-year-old mother had however been arranged in advance. He touched her feet in a traditional gesture of respect as she put a red stripe of vermilion on his forehead as a blessing, while crackers burst outside amid supporters' chants of "Modi, Modi."

Persona grata again

Narendra Modi's trajectory from a shunned regional politician accused of complicity in sectarian slaughter to a respected victor of the biggest-ever democratic vote has been followed in the UK, with David Cameron issuing an invitation to the new Indian prime minister-elect.
Britain froze links with Modi in 2002 following serious inter-community violence in Gujarat, the western Indian state where he was chief minister, in which more than 1,000 people died, many of them Muslims. Modi was accused of condoning the violence and even encouraging it – allegations he has vehemently denied. The UK cut ties with his administration, and he was later denied a US visa.
But on Friday a spokesman for Cameron said: "The prime minister called Narendra Modi this morning to congratulate him on his victory in the Indian elections and the record turnout, making this the biggest democratic election in history.
"Mr Modi said he would be delighted to accept the prime minister's invitation to visit the UK. Both leaders agreed on the importance of the UK-India relationship and agreed to work together to strengthen it in the months ahead."
Cameron also tweeted his personal congratulations
, adding a desire to "work together to get the most from UK-India relationship".
The situation is unlikely to change if Labour, the party in government in 2002, re-takes office next year. Labour has previously expressed willingness to engage with the BJP leader. The Labour MP Barry Gardiner invited Modi to speak at the Commons last year – an offer the Indian politician declined.
US president Barack Obama told Modi by phone that he looked forward to working closely with him to "fulfill the extraordinary promise of the US-India strategic partnership," the White House said.
"The president invited Narendra Modi to visit Washington at a mutually agreeable time to further strengthen our bilateral relationship."
A US visit could come as soon as September, at the UN general assembly in New York.


East Conference Finals Heat-Pacers Preview: Of course it's down to this

Game 1 Sunday, May 18 3:30 p.m. ET, ABC
Game 2 Tuesday, May 20 8:30 p.m. ET ESPN
Game 3 Saturday, May 24 8:30 p.m. ET ESPN
Game 4 Monday, May 26 8:30 p.m. ET ESPN
Game 5 Wednesday, May 28 8:30 p.m. ET ESPN (if necessary)
Game 6 Friday, May 30 8:30 p.m. ET ESPN (if necessary)
Game 7 Sunday, 8:30 p.m. ET ESPN (if necessary)
Season searies: The Indiana Pacers and Miami Heat split the season series 2-2 and it went exactly how you would expect. Both teams won their two home gamesand lost on the road. The Pacers won the ugly, grind-it-out games while Miami lost both games they failed to score 90 points. The Heat won both boatraces, as Indiana couldn't keep up offensively when the game opened up.
The Pacers rode their dominant early-season winning streak to a win in the first matchup in Indianapolis, 90-84. It was a statement by the Pacers that they were ready to compete with Miami for the title. LeBron James and Dwayne Wade were held to 17 each as Roy Hibbertwent off for 24.
Their second matchup just eight days later in Miami turned things around, as the champs struck back, edging Indiana 97-94 by erasing a 14-point Pacers lead with less than five minutes left. The Heat just hit a flurry of shots and plays late in the game and left the Pacers stunned.

Review - 'Million Dollar Arm' Delivers Pleasant, If Predictable, Entertainment

Disney’s live action movie Million Dollar Arm opens this weekend against some pretty sizable competition in the form of Godzilla, and if you’d asked me a week ago which film I’d be recommending and which I’d enjoy more, I’d probably have guessed the latter. But it’s the sports comedy-drama that won me over, despite its flaws.


Disney’s had past success with these sort of feel-good true-story sports films, including Remember the Titans, The Rookie, and Miracle, all of which benefited from smaller budgets that enhanced the significance of their box office returns. With a focus on the business end of things, Million Dollar Arm plays more like 2012′s Moneyball, but with half the budget and so better chance for a higher profit margin. The concept behind the film is an allegory about the film itself, since Disney is taking a common film genre and style, and adding Indian characters and locales in the sly assumption this will help increase the film’s marketability in India and overseas markets in general. It’s a smart play, and the fact it’s a good movie will probably help the plan work out as intended.Families looking for something new to see with the kids, sports fans, and anyone who just wants an entertaining time without superheroes or monsters will likely find Million Dollar Arm the best for their weekend viewing. It doesn’t need to attract all that much attention to have a successful opening, since it’s $25 million production budget plus perhaps $50 million in markiting cost sets the bar pretty low.
There’s no doubt Godzilla will own the weekend, and Neighbors will have a decent enough follow-up weekend to grab second place. The only question, then, is whether The Amazing Spider-Man 2 will have a larger drop than expected. If Godzilla and Neighbors nab enough of Spidey’s main target audiance(particularly if Godzilla overperforms north of $70 million), and then if Million Dollar Arm pulls away enough of Spidey’s family attendance to both boost itself and sink the wall-crawler further, it’s at least technically possible the sports flick could score a surprise third-place finish, although that’s highly unlikely. Anything north of $12 million will be plenty fine for Million Dollar Arm, and it’s tracking to hit that number or slightly better. If it managed to actually top $15 million (again, unlikely but worth talking about as a “what if”), that would be a pleasant surprise for the studio.
It’s being called clichéd, schmaltzy, and predictable, and at times it is certainly any or all of those things. But it’s also good-hearted, funny, and usually pretty entertaining. Critics seem to be giving it mostly (by a small margin) positive reviews, and I expect audiences will be slightly kinder to it, so I’d guess it’ll enjoy modestly positive word of mouth and could even strike a chord with some folks who wanted a new approach to this standard genre. It probably won’t be a breakout hit like The Blind Side, and nobody’s getting any Oscar nods for this one, but there’s plenty of room for it to make a nice little profit and then enjoy additional success on home entertainment.
Jon Hamm — he of Mad Men fame — plays a sports agent who, with his partner played by Aasif Mandvi (best know to most of you for his work on The Daily Show, and to some of you with particularly good viewing habits as the cynical doctor on Jericho), left lucrative jobs at a larger company to go solo, but who are now facing imminent failure of their venture. Then, in a moment of amusing inspiration, Hamm has an idea: they’ll combine the “anyone can try out and win” concept of the talent show Britain’s Got Talent with the foreign popularity of the sport cricket, and the talent compitionto discover new professional baseball pitchers… in India. The hope is, this contest will help make baseball popular in India and create a market for massive sales of team merchandising, which will turn Hamm’s and Mandvi’s agency into a rousing success. The high profile of the competition alone is enough to garner lots of media attention, and gets some other sports players interested in the little agency as well.
Hamm gives an excellent performance as a man used to comfort and only interested in the success of his business. He hasn’t the time for relationships, nor for sympathy for these youths pulled out of poverty and suddenly thrust into a world they’re unprepared to deal with. Hamm’s conversion from selfish, greedy jerk to a more compassionate man rediscovering his love of sports isn’t rushed, and he even has early changes of heart that give way to backsliding and regret that he tried to care.Madhur Mittal, known best for his role as the older brother in Slumdog Millionaire, and Suraj Sharma, who starred in 2012′s Life of Pi, play the two main Indian characters. These young men try out for the contest and rise through the ranks, attracting the attention and admiration of their communities and ultimately of their entire nation. Meanwhile, they experience culture shock when they travel to the U.S. and see how Hamm’s self-involved, formerly well-off, all-business character really lives. The youths come from different backgrounds and have different approaches to the contest, but their gradual bonding and how they rely on one another to navigate the cultural difficulties they experience in the U.S. is a nice example that both compares and contrasts with the themes of “culture clash” in the rest of the story.
Lake Bell is Hamm’s love interest, a woman in medical school who rents a guest house in Hamm’s back yard. She comes across as an actual real person with personality instead of just a generic prop as most love interests tend to be in these sorts of films. Her relationship with the young Indian kids is a nice touch and provides more authenticity when she confronts Hamm about his treatment of the athletes. This relationship isn’t just a shoehorned angle, either, she’s a real person who was part of the events, it seems. I’ve seen her described as “quirky” and “perpetually happy,” but I don’t think either of those descriptions apply to her at all, and I was particularly glad she wasn’t the cliched “quirky” girlfriend persona so common in films about men who need to overcome rigidity in their personal lives.
Alan Arkin has a relatively small but important role as the lazy but sharp-eared talent scout who helps pick the winning athletes, and there’s a wonderful little moment in a diner between Arkin and Hamm. Bill Paxton is a pitching coach with the improbable but not impossible task of turning the naive Indian kids into baseball players worthy of tryouts for professional teams. These are two actors who could’ve been put to even more effective use, particularly Paxton in light of the task put in front of him. But they’re good with what they have, and there’s already a feeling that the film is 15 to 20 minutes too long, so I doubt much more needed to be done with them anyway.
The story is at its best when it puts the Indian athletes front and center, and focuses on their feelings of responsibility to their families and communities, and their (initially) misplaced sense of loyalty and trust in Hamm. And the India settings likewise add much to the story, with the life-changing potential of the contest brought into sharp focus as the event moves around the country igniting the imagination and often desperation of so many young people and their families.With a very strong first half, the film settles into a more predictable but still overall entertaining second half, and it’s fun to watch as the two narratives — Hamm’s redemption, and the redemption of the young Indian men — converge. Meanwhile, there’s lots of humor, as much about Hamm’s behavior and befuddlement with his new experiences and responsibilities as about the fish-out-of-water aspect of the boys’ story. Mandvi has great banter, and a late scene where he has to just sit and listen as Hamm seemingly puts their necks way out on the chopping block is classic — Mandvi says nothing, but the expression on his face speak volumes. The tryouts themselves are lots of fun, even if we know who will obviously end up winning. I’m glad the film took time to show us into the homes of the families and give us glimpses of how the parents simultaneously held out so much hope for their children’s success yet also feared so much for their safety and spirits.
On the other hand, it’s hard to ignore the obvious fact the story shares one important similarity with Godzilla — both stories would’ve been better if they’d chosen different protagonists. For Million Dollar Arm, just ask yourself who has the more interesting character arc: The white well-off businessman who visits another culture and learns valuable lessons about how to stop being so selfish and appreciate all the great things in his already-very-comfortable life? Or the two impoverished kids from India who suddenly experience the arrival of Major League Baseball in their country and have a rare shot at becoming millionaire athletes, eventually leaving their small communities for the first time in their lives to travel to the U.S.?
I’d have rather seen the entire story from the perspective of the boys. And I feel Hamm’s character would’ve worked far better as a supporting role, without some of the story having to center on less relevant aspects of his daily life, instead of on these kids’ lives and experiences. Indeed, while it’s easy for us to invest emotionally in the two youths’ goals and root for them, we don’t have much to invest in when it comes to Hamm’s arc — he’s a guy used to having a lot of money, who wants his business to be successful so he can continue having a lot of money. His arc just can’t compete with the athletes’, and it’s weird that the film eventually literally acknowledges that fact in the third act.

I’m surprised Disney didn’t see the potential benefits of changing the film’s point of view to that of the Indian youths, since it would certainly be a more unique approach to the feel-good true-story sports genre. Besides comparisons to Remember the Titans and Moneyball, we’d be talking about Slumdog Millionaire, and that’s a comparison offering even more lucrative prospects for the film, not to mention playing even better into the story’s symbolism of its own nature. However, as much as we can — and should — complain about failure to tell these sorts of stories from the more interesting point of view and provide space for voices and personal journeys of people besides white western males, Million Dollar Arm doesn’t lack an Indian perspective. Four of the six primary characters are of Indian descent, and we also get lots of other Indian characters with significant moments in the film. And half of the story is set in communities and cities all across India.It was also frustrating that after so much time and good effort put into setting up Hamm’s emotional limitations and his tendency to mistreat other people when under stress, the story then resorts to a simplistic montage to demonstrate his changes of heart. Letting us actually experience just a few of those moments more thoroughly would’ve made them more meaningful and served the character and story much better. The most important part of how these characters got a second chance and redeemed themselves lies in those crucial interactions that bonded them together and made them decide to rise or fall together, and a montage just doesn’t convey it properly.That said, there’s no shortage of moments of clarity for the characters, and even in this less dramatically impactful form, it still tells a good story and has fun doing so (which most films containing similar mistakes usually end up failing to do). You don’t have to be a sports fan to like this movie, and even when it’s getting predictable you’ll probably find yourself enjoying it anyway. It’s not brilliant or daring, but it’s got genuine heart and offers some new approaches to a pretty cliched genre. It’s a good film if you’re looking for something new and different to see this weekend. And the end credit sequence using actual footage of the real-life people portrayed in the film, including footage of the very first tryouts in India, will drag a smile out of you no matter how cynical you might pretend to be, trust me.